Friday, June 20, 2008

Good Shoot

http://abcnews.go.com/WNT/story?id=2086555
Nevada Family Court Judge Allegedly Shot Over Divorce Ruling
Courts Boost Security as Judge's Increasingly Become Targets
By NANCY WEINER
June 16, 2006

The shooting of a family court judge this week in Nevada points to an alarming phenomenon in which those involved in emotional and acrimonious cases are taking their frustrations out on the judges.

On Monday Nevada Family Court Judge Chuck Weller was shot in his office by a man he dealt with in a divorce case.

The suspect, Darren Mack, is a multmillionaire father of three whose relatives say was deeply upset over Weller's rulings in his divorce case.

"He felt that the financial remuneration that was awarded to his wife was totally unjust and unfair," said Mack's cousin, Jeff Donner.

Mack allegedly used a sniper's rifle to fire through the window of the judge's third-floor office window, shooting Weller in the chest. He was hospitalized and survived the shooting.

Later that day Mack's estranged wife, Charla Mack, was found dead in the garage of her home. Darren Mack was also charged for the slaying and remains a fugitive.

New Protections for Family Court Judges
Mack's campaign against Weller began months in advance, according to the judge's spokesman, who said the suspect found plenty of company in his frustrations on the Internet.

One blogger called the judge a terrorist. Another complained he was a bully and abusive. A third compared him to Hitler.

Family court judges across the country said, sadly, that such venom is not unusual. These courts are actually considered by many judges to be even more volatile than criminal courts because the plaintiffs have so much at stake -- custody, visitation rights, money -- and emotions are often at the breaking point.

"We draw the ire of some people who are incapable of thinking objectively because the pressures of divorce and custody matters sometimes drive them to the bitter end," said Judge Charles McGee.

In New York state, every family courthouse is now equipped with a day care center. The policy was put in place after a Brooklyn parole officer shot and killed his estranged wife in a courthouse hallway packed with children.

"We terminate parental rights sometimes, which is the equivalent of the death penalty in civil courts. That's not something that goes down very easy," said Judge Stephen Rubin, president of the National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges.

Many of the nation's courthouses have been made more secure since Sept. 11, 2001. Monday's shooting prompted the introduction of legislation to replace courthouse windows with bulletproof glass.

As for Weller, he survived the shooting but went straight from the hospital into hiding, where he's likely to remain until his attacker is caught.
------------------------------------------------
Found this a couple of weeks ago when people were talking about individuals "pushing the reset button." Figured it'd make a good follow-up to what I just posted.

The gist of the story is that well-known crooked judge for divorce court broke up a family, and the father "pushed the reset button" with a rifle. What I got from the retelling I heard was that Weller bought it, DRT. Apparently not.

Dang.

Darren Mack, the guy who shot Mr. Weller, was no choirboy. As I understand it, he later murdered his ex-wife.

That said, Mr. Weller has a history of screwing men over in divorce court, backing them down with promises of asset forfeiture, stuff like that. And the law is stacked against men so much in divorce court that if they get screwed, it's 99.999% of the time the fault of the court/judge.

Used to be, not getting married and not having kids was a way for a guy to protect himself. Still is, except in NJ.

Anyway. Good shoot. Too bad he didn't kill him.

This needs to keep happening until the divorce laws are reformed, until fathers have rights, until men aren't looked at as gravy trains by the law.

I'm thinking Chucky is going to at least think about taking a round to the chest every time he steps into his court room, and that's the way it should be.

Post script: What caliber for judges?

1 comment:

Andrito Bandito said...

I'm very interested into how you deemed this judge to be a "well known crooked judge" outside of the single case referenced in this article. It would seem to me, as a child of divorce, that many of the claims you make are correct. However, that does not substantiate in any way the drawing of conclusions from which you have provided no evidence.

In my opinion, its best to get a good profile of someone before wishing death upon them.